RSS
 

Would this Sheriff Joe be a good candidate for the GOP?

08 Mar

He believes in racial profiling.

Doesn’t consider murders of “minorities” inside of his makeshift prison to be a big deal.

Doesn’t have a problem with his guards having sex with female prisoners.

Doesn’t have a problem with the fact that immigrants built his home.

Etc.

Just how does this guy keep getting away with modern day slavery and murder? It’s amazing! I just heard about this guy for the first time on the show Nightline.

http://www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/sheriff-arpaio-sued-over-racial-profiling-latinos-maricopa-county

http://blog.sojo.net/2009/02/18/stop-sheriff-joe-arpaios-racial-profiling/

Note: to whomever it may concern. If this non violating question like the palin question is deleted, I will just repost it and appeal it.
Yeah yellow, I’ve seen many just right here who said they had no problem at all with racial profiling. I’ll bet they would think different if the shoe was on the other foot.
I think they said he’s been voted back into office 5 times already! Now you know that couldn’t be the discrimated against “minorities” voting for him. So who does that leave?
To the person who sued him and won, good for you! Congrats! He acted like all that lawsuit money was nothing when asked about it. He said, “oh, we only paid out $30 million! ONLY 30 million?! He looks like a true redneck and a fool!
One of his prisoners (who looked like he was white but could have been Latino) said something like this clown really needs to be doing some kind of lame reality television show instead of being a Sheriff. Because he’s all for the cameras and lights”. Looks like he has a lot more lawsuits coming up. The whole thing is insane, and in freaking 2009!

 
9 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , ,

  1. Randy B

    March 8, 2010 at 9:10 pm

    Sheriff Joe should actually be in jail himself.

     
  2. neal h

    March 8, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    I’D VOTE FOR HIM IN A NEW YORK MINUTE. DON’T YOU GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY?

     
  3. yellow.45

    March 8, 2010 at 10:03 pm

    Not only are Sheriff Joe’s practices of racial profiling discriminatory and unjust, they are downright ineffective. His department is setting a disturbing national trend in which immigration enforcement is focused on “the easiest targets, not the most dangerous fugitives.” As a result, 40,000 felony warrants lay outstanding on Sheriff Joe’s desk, 911 response times have worsened, and his county is a less safe place. Regardless of your understanding of the greater immigration debate, this is simply bad law-enforcement.

    sounds like GOP material to me.

     
  4. Phoenix

    March 8, 2010 at 10:17 pm

    Sheriff Joe is an egomaniac who need to be locked up.

     
  5. Lttlehrse

    March 8, 2010 at 10:44 pm

    You cite the ACLU as a credible source? They are the most despicable anti-American group of ALL.

    I’d vote for Sheriff Joe and task him with rounding up ALL ILLEGALS and libbies.

    Are you wringing your hands over the murdering terrorists “civil rights”? Guess you missed the video of AMERICANS being beheaded.

     
  6. Arminius Victorium Germanicus

    March 8, 2010 at 10:59 pm

    He is crooked AND ridiculous. I sued him for false imprisonment, and won.

    But he’d be a GREAT GOP candidate–if you want to lose.

    His politics are really irrelevant, albeit I do dislike his right wing positions. Once this level of hogwash and ballyhoo is reached, conservative, liberal, and reactionary cease to matter.

    By the way, for those who see something “cool” in his anti-alien “sweeps”, you might want to know that most of them are released, not due to technicalities or small change “lack of evidence”, but because they aren’t illegal and NEVER WERE.

    Arpaio isn’t what “America is all about”…he’s what B.S. is all about.

    Ask yourself these questions: (1. Why, when crime was going down everywhere else in the U.S. was it still INCREASING in Maricopa County, Arizona? (2. Why does Maricopa County have more people locked up, per capita, than Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia EVER did? (3. Why is
    MCSO manpower useful in dealing with crack cocaine (epidemic in the County), crystal methamphetamine (easier to find than a good cup of coffee!), and the hideous corruption in the area tied up with ridiculous publicity stunts like the huge “camera friendly” raids to blanket arrest Latinos? (4. Arpaio is about 200 miles from the Mexican border. If this joker is so effective, why do most authorities conclude that unlawful immigration to his county is actually one of very few venues in the U.S. where that movement is increasing? The recession figures underline this!

    It’s quite humorous that clowns like Arpaio question the Civil Liberties Union…the same outfit that was so helpful to “the Bard of Lard” Limbaugh during his drug problems and ultimate coverup. They’re far more what the Constitution is about than lunatic blowhards like the current Maricopa County Sheriff. Indeed, this clown doesn’t even recognize “innocent until proven guilty” and does all he can to pervert and obstruct justice. And I proved that in court, by the way, as have HUNDREDS of others.

    He is a very unfunny joke, and yes, he, himself, belongs in the slammer. Publicity and crackpot stunts are NOT to be confused with law enforcement.

     
  7. I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK!!!!

    March 8, 2010 at 11:38 pm

    No…he actually wants to stop illegal immigration, something neither party seems willing to do

     
  8. Mark G

    March 9, 2010 at 12:10 am

    People vote him back in because his techniques are apparently working…

    your mind may be made up so I doubt that any of these facts will change your opinion.

    Traffic stops apparently lead to bigger busts:
    http://www.mcso.org/include/pr_pdf/12-2-2009%20News%20Release.pdf
    http://www.mcso.org/include/pr_pdf/CSO%2011-18-2009%20News%20Release.pdf

    Driving while Chinese:
    http://www.mcso.org/include/pr_pdf/Chinese%20Arrest%20News%20Release.pdf

    Dems backed human trafficking law !!!!!!!! Gov. Janet Napolitano signed the Bill in 2005 she is now the Secertary of Homeland Security
    http://www.humantrafficking.org/updates/76

    You are complaining about someone who is enforcing the laws and doing his job. Why don’t you complain about the cause! A porous border which anyone can apparently cross illegally. I have no problem with people coming here from other countries legally. Millions enter this country legally each year! Why do you support people who think the laws do not apply to them and enter the US illegally.

    Do you support human trafficking? Do you think that human smugglers are treating their human cargo fairly? Do you want drugs to flow into the US unchecked? Do you want people forced into prostitution. Do you want people working for low wages in poor conditions afraid to complain because of fear of deportation? (If they came here legally they wound not have anything to fear would they)

     
  9. re-pixed

    March 9, 2010 at 1:07 am

    It’s one thing for a law enforcement officer to uphold his/her rigid principles according to established law and quite another to decide which laws you will obey and which you will ignore.

    He sounds exactly like the Southern Sheriffs before 1964 (and some after).
    Perhaps the Federal Government should step in to enforce the law.